See, something that annoys me to no end is Hollywood's inability to produce anything new that's actually worth watching and not just a glorified tax write-off. Moviemakers are such wimps that they stick to things they consider 'proven': sequels and remaked.
Then I visited http://www.upcomingmovies.com (to my disgust it's been co-opted by Yahell), just too take a gander at some of the movies coming out in the coming months and perhaps discover that all this pathetic behavior was in my head. The now-fouled-by-Yahoo page now has listing of the day's "Most Visited Previews". And an amusing list it is.
- Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban. A sequel to a sequel, created from an incredibly popular book. This one gets half a pass from me because at least the Harry Potter books are encouraging kids to read. But as far as the movies go, they're a predestined success.
- The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King. Another sequel from a book. Ditto.
- The Fast and the Furious 2. Sequel.
- When Harry Met Lloyd: Dumb and Dumberer. Sequel.
- The Matrix: Reloaded. Sequel.
And so on and so on. Mad Max 4. Terminator 3. Anaconda 2. The Hulk (which isn't a sequel, but sure isn't a new idea). Star Wars Ep 3. Indiana Jones 4. Batman. Spiderman. Rocky 2,753.
Now maybe I'm just picky. But I really wish that moviemakers would do something different and take some risks, try something new, instead of falling back on sure-thing sequels and comic book ripoffs. But on the other hand, if that's what people are going to go see, how can moviemakers be blamed? If polls say that some piece of recycled tripe with the current flavor of the week will do better then something with substance, why wouldn't they go for the former? And when even the 'greats' like Spielburg and Lucas are falling into the trap, how long will we have to wait for new ideas?
[Rant on cookiecutter television postponed because it's too unspeakably horrible to even contemplate sober. I'll get back to you in October.)