tv // lbd // shoulder touch

Oh please

Had to say my own piece on this because... well, because otherwise I'll have to start doing my laundry.

Suz, no matter what any of the half-witted awards people say, you didn't 'ballot-stuff'. People who voted for Suz, neither did you. I know you guys don't need to hear this, but I was so amazed when I heard it that I needed to say it for my own sake. Incredible. Next year, there will no doubt be a rule that you must vote for a certain percentage of a category's applicants in order to not be considered a cheater. Either that, or it'll be a rule that says you're not allowed to vote for someone on the basis of name recognition, and if you're suspected of such a atrocity the said story will be disqualified.

Give me a f***ing break. Geine, sweetie, don't waste your time.
  • Current Mood: annoyed annoyed
  • Current Music: Evanescence -- Imaginary
Re: Okay.
I'll say didn't make any difference one way or the other in the vote, so why did you bother to bring it up at all?

I have already answered that three times. Let's try again.

I brought it up because if what happened was an attempt to 'help' Suz win, her so-called supporters need to know that they broke the rules and that their 'help' could have gotten her banned. Ballot stuffing on someone's behalf is not doing them a favour.
Re: Okay.
[Ballot stuffing on someone's behalf is not doing them a favour]

With all due respect, I think your definition of ballot-stuffing, in this case, is a little over the top.