Unhyphenated American - A little interesting reading from USAtoday.com [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Alli Snow

[ website | czar of salmon ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Links
[Links:| Hot Air Michelle IMAO Fox News Pittsburg Weather Local traffic The Onion SF Giants Wikipedia Amazon Cheezburgers? SpoilerTV Userpics Customize Scrapbook gossymer minty-peach the fulcrum refutare ]

A little interesting reading from USAtoday.com [Oct. 4th, 2007|10:25 pm]
Previous Entry Add to Memories Tell a Friend Next Entry
[Mood | contemplative]
[Music |Weird Al - EBay]

A liberal's lament: The NRA might be right after all
By Jonathan Turley

This term, the Supreme Court may finally take up the Voldemort Amendment, the part of the Bill of Rights that shall not be named by liberals. For more than 200 years, progressives and polite people have avoided acknowledging that following the rights of free speech, free exercise of religion and free assembly, there is "the right of the people to keep and bear arms." Of course, the very idea of finding a new individual right after more than two centuries is like discovering an eighth continent in constitutional law, but it is hardly the cause of celebration among civil liberties groups.

Like many academics, I was happy to blissfully ignore the Second Amendment. It did not fit neatly into my socially liberal agenda. Yet, two related cases could now force liberals into a crisis of conscience. The Supreme Court is expected to accept review of District of Columbia v. Heller and Parker v. District of Columbia, involving constitutional challenges to the gun-control laws in Washington.

The D.C. law effectively bars the ownership of handguns for most citizens and places restrictions on other firearms. The District's decision to file these appeals after losing in the D.C. appellate court was driven more by political than legal priorities. By taking the appeal, D.C. politicians have put gun-control laws across the country at risk with a court more likely to uphold the rulings than to reverse them. It has also put the rest of us in the uncomfortable position of giving the right to gun ownership the same fair reading as more favored rights of free press or free speech.

[...]

None of this is easy for someone raised to believe that the Second Amendment was the dividing line between the enlightenment and the dark ages of American culture. Yet, it is time to honestly reconsider this amendment and admit that ... here's the really hard part ... the NRA may have been right. This does not mean that Charlton Heston is the new Rosa Parks or that no restrictions can be placed on gun ownership. But it does appear that gun ownership was made a protected right by the Framers and, while we might not celebrate it, it is time that we recognize it.


The whole thing
LinkLeave a comment

Comments:
[User Picture]From: [info]andveryginger
2007-10-05 12:38 pm (UTC)

(Link)

Saw this linked from Hot Air this morning. Interesting entry, really. It's a shame it likely wouldn't be endorsed by the rest of the party. Heaven forbid there actually be something of a moderate center any more...
[User Picture]From: [info]sparky_girl82
2007-10-05 06:41 pm (UTC)

(Link)

it's bad, I know this is something that I should actually take seriously, but after the "Voldemort Amendment" I was no good...LOL
[User Picture]From: [info]allisnow
2007-10-05 08:17 pm (UTC)

(Link)

lol, I know, that part cracked me up too.